catholic church

Shackled love: The Pursuit to End the Shackling of Pregnant Inmates During Labor

Posted on

An interview with Sarah[1]


My name is Mark Schmidt; I hold a Masters degrees in Social Work and a Master of Arts in Catholic Thought and Life. I currently work as a hospice chaplain in Illinois but live in Iowa. Several years ago I spoke with a woman who shared with me the story of the birth of her child. An occasion so sacred as the birth of a child should be a joyous one. New life entering the world should be greeted with celebration. In this particular story this was not the case. Instead, one innocent child entered the world amidst humiliation and suffering and under severe threat to its wellbeing. What makes this story unique is that this child’s mother gave birth while serving a prison sentence in the State of Iowa. I myself would have not believed what I was hearing had it come from anyone but this young mother. The pain, sadness, and humiliation in this woman’s voice left me speechless as she shared her story. The following is as accurate of a description as I can tell of what it was like for this young mother to give birth in prison in Iowa.

In order to tell you this story I would like to introduce you to Sarah. Sarah is a real person. She broke the law and was sentenced to serve time in the State of Iowa. She was pregnant and incarcerated. When the time came for her to give birth instead of being whisked away to the hospital by a caring family member full of love and support she traveled an excruciating trip to Iowa City in a manner that was no less than torturous. Her description of the trip and the restraints used during her more than one-and-a-half hour trip matches those described to me by an email from the Iowa Department of Corrections in 2007:


“If they are more than six months pregnant, the offender should be placed in cuffs, belly chain, security box, and padlock; the leg irons will be carried by the escorting officer. The belly chain will be placed above the offenders’ stomach; so as not to cause discomfort. If it is a medical emergency, the shift supervisor can determine a form of lesser restraint, in order to get the offender out the door more quickly.”[2]


Sarah was on her way to the hospital to give birth to her child early one morning, chained up and strapped to a chair for over an hour-and-a-half. Once she arrived at the hospital she was handcuffed to the bed, and had “leg shackles”[3] applied as the hospital staff prepped her for surgery; she was to give birth via c-section. According to Sarah, while the hospital staff gave her intravenous fluids and took blood samples she remained in “leg shackles”. Sarah said she does not remember a time that the restraints were removed, although she could not be sure if they were or were not completely removed during surgery. Immediately after giving birth she was once again placed in “leg shackles”. This treatment continued even after Sarah began retaining water in her legs and ankles, causing painful swelling, the “leg shackles” were not removed. They remained on her legs. The only relief she received from this torture was the occasional visit by a merciful and courageous nurse who demanded their removal so she could make sure that no damage was being done due to the “leg shackles.” As is often necessary following delivery, Sarah needed to move around to prevent complications from the surgery. “I had to walk around the hospital floor with shackles on my legs.” Humiliating is the only thing that can describe this treatment. “It was degrading…They treat you like you are not even human.”

Sarah’s voice trembled as she said to me that her experience giving birth to her child “was just horrible.” Her voice was soft during most of our conversation. There was no joy in her voice as she described the birth of her child. Instead, what should have been one of the happiest days of her life, she described it to me simply: “it felt like hell.”  I asked Sarah what she would like from telling her story. The first thing she said is that “having your baby in prison is not easy.” She then became very earnest. “If my story can help anyone, just one woman, not have to go through what I did, then telling my story will be worth it.”

As I hung up the phone with Sarah I was stunned at what I had just listened to from this young woman. A week prior to my conversation with Sarah the Iowa Department of Corrections had told me that the issue was not a problem and that my pursuit of legislation to prohibit the use of restraints on women during their stay at the hospital to give birth was unnecessary. What the Department of Corrections ignores is that this practice has happened. Furthermore, we need a law that brings all correctional facilities under a universal procedure for women who give birth while serving sentences or are awaiting sentencing. This should include, not only the Department of Correction, but also all county and municipal jurisdictions so that, no matter where a woman serves her sentence, no matter what authority she serves it under, she and her unborn child are treated with respect and their lives are not endangered by barbaric practices such as these.

Some may question Sarah’s honesty, integrity, and the validity of her story. After all, isn’t she a criminal who gave up her right to have a pleasant delivery when she broke the law? The simple answer to such a question is “NO!” Regardless of Sarah’s crime, her dignity as a human being should never have been denied. Sarah’s experience was not only humiliating but also dangerous. This ordeal was not only dangerous to Sarah’s life, but also risked the life and safety of her unborn and completely innocent child.[4] Shouldn’t our State be in the practice of protecting innocent life of children and not endangering it? This should not have happened to Sarah, and it should never happen again.

I am writing to say that such legislation is necessary to prevent another story like Sarah’s. This should never have happened to Sarah, especially in the State of Iowa. How many more Sarah’s will there be if legislation is not passed to prohibit such treatment? Please support legislation to ban the use of restraints on pregnant inmates in our state and county prisons and jails.




Mark Schmidt, MSW, MA

[1] Sarah is an alias I have given to the woman I have spoke with in order to respect her wishes to remain anonymous for fear of any retribution or added humiliation.

[2] This excerpt was taken from an email sent to me from Chris Gesie of the Iowa Department of Corrections; December 2007.

[3] “Leg shackles” were the words used by Sarah to describe the restraints used on her.

[4] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists publicly support legislation to prohibit the use of restraints on pregnant inmates during labor due to the safety risks to the life of mother and child. Highlighted in a letter to The Rebecca Project for Human Rights dated June 12, 2007.


What would you do? E:60 – Perfect

Posted on Updated on

An alpha male: fighter pilot, marathoner, FBI agent; the epitome of the “perfect” man physically and intellectually. Then he finds out his daughter will be born with Down Syndrome and pressures his wife to have an abortion, she refuses. This is what saints are made of, they are not perfect, but they open themselves up to the redemptive act of Christ. His wife refused to abort and his life was changed forever. This story is beautiful. 9 out of 10 children diagnosed prenataly with Down Syndrome are aborted. Perhaps this family’s story can help prevent the abortions of children that are not considered “perfect” by our materialistic society.

Sigh No More About Love

Posted on Updated on

Singing, as Augustine is believed to have said, is praying twice. Sometimes I find this hard to believe when I listen to much of the music that is played on the radio lately. My friends know that I am an avid music listener. I listen to all forms and types of music. Some of my favorite artists include: Nat King Cole, Garth Brooks, Mahalia Jackson, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Sam Cooke, Nneka, Def Leppard, Johnny Cash, Merle Haggard, George Jones, Adele… and the list goes on and on.

It is sad that music that is on the radio these days, with the exception of people like Adele, is shallow, and often, promotes decrepit notions of what love really is, what relationships really are about. I cringe when I hear songs like “The Trouble With Love” by Kelly Clarkson, or Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” because these songs, and others like them, equate love to feelings and emotion. Worse yet, they make love out to be something that has nothing to do with one’s will but rather one’s carnal or desires. Pop culture says that love is something that imposes itself upon a person, as if love is an incurable disease.

And then, I heard about a group called Mumford & Sons. If you have not heard of them, I now introduce you to a phenomenal band. Their music sounds to me like an admixture of folk, rock, Gaelic, Appalachian, and a few other unique-to-them-only symphony. Even greater is the content found within the lyrics. Here is just one excerpt from their song “Sigh No More”:

“Love it will not betray you, dismay or enslave you,
It will set you free
Be more like the man you were made to be.” (Sigh No More, 2010)

This short phrase could, and should, take the listener hours to unpack. As Catholic we know that love is not an emotion or an act of one’s desires. Instead, we know that love is an act of the will, a free choice; to sacrifice oneself for the sake of another. This is the true nature, and the profound depth of the meaning of love. We are made in the Divine Image of God; the Author of Love. This is so, and as such, love does not destroy, it builds up. The more we love, the more we become like the Author of Love, “the man you were made to be.” There is freedom in love. We are reminded that freedom is not license to do as we please, but it is to do good without restraint.

“Freedom is not the liberty to do anything whatsoever. It is the freedom to do good, and in this alone happiness is to be found. The good is thus the goal of freedom.” 

(CDF, Instruction on Christian Freedom and Liberation)

Love provides such freedom. When we choose, as individuated persons, and as whole communities, to give of ourselves for the good of ourselves and the common good, we open greater freedom to the world. It frees us from selfishness, materialism, individualism, narcissism, hatred, anger, oppression, violence, and the likes.

More on love later, for now, seek out artists like Mumford & Sons who speak the truth about Love!

God’s Peace,


Debate Night: I’ll Make you Hate Him More Than You Dislike Me

Posted on Updated on

It is not uncommon for pundits, politicians, and citizens alike to complain about the vitriol in political campaigns. Money is spent hand over fist on television ads, fliers in the mail, billboards, and various other means to attack the opposing candidate. Statements are taken out of context, complex policies and positions are reduced to 30 second “take that!” tv spots all at the expense of true dialogue and engaged decision-making.

This has been just as evident in the presidential and vice-presidential “debates” this election season. Although the candidates have offerred some specific details regarding the economy, social policy, and foreign policy, it seems more time is spent, by both sides, trying to convince the public that “the other guy” hates everything the the viewer holds dear and wishes to destroy peace and prosperity for their own self aggrandization and satisfaction. Although, it is possible that there is the occasional candidate who is truly sociopathic (lacking care for others) I refuse to accept the premise that this is the norm for politicians. It is unbecoming of anyone seeking higher office to lower themselves to these tactics; however, we share responsibility in the negativity and lack of charity in campaigns because we are unwilling to truly educate ourselves on the issues and the positions of candidates. We are moved to vote and act by our emotional reactions to campaign ads and catch-phrases. We continue to vote for “the lesser of two evils” which allows candidates not to rise to the occasion and expectation of the American people, but rather, to make their opponent less appetizing than themselves. If you are starving in the wilderness and you have to choose between eating a rat or the stomach contents of a deer carcass left by a coyote, you will eat but it wont be pleasant and it wont necessarily be good for you. What you need is nutrition, substance; what you settle for is trash. We should refuse to settle. We should begin holding our politicians accountable. We should begin to hold ourselves accountable. Do we engage in painting others with a broad political brush? “Democrats are baby-killers!” “Republicans hate the poor!” These narrow-minded approaches to politics and government are not what God had planned for us when He gave us authority over this temporal world. We are guided by Holy Mother Church to follow a different path in political campaigns. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published a document called “Instruction on Christian Freedom and Liberation” Contained within this remarkable Magisterial document the Church places campaigns like the one we are witnessing from both sides in the realm of unjust armed struggle when She says: “Equally unacceptable are detestable smear campaigns capable of destroying a person psychologically or morally.”

I have too often heard people say that politics is the cause of many problems. I do not believe this. I do believe partisanship, “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” mentality and tactics are the cause for many problems. But politics, when used and not abused, just as any other “good” gifted to humanity is used appropriately, can be the cause for bringing about a more just and peaceful world.

God’s Peace,